For the past few years I have been studying the
Mediterranean Undercurrent. At the Strait of Gibraltar, there is an exchange of waters. Warm, salty Mediterranean Water flows out into the Atlantic Ocean, and cooler, fresher Atlantic Water flows in at the surface maintaining the volume of the Mediterranean Sea. Why is the Mediterranean so salty? While, it's not the saltiest sea in the world, it is quite saltier than the oceans because of higher evaporation due to the intense sunlight. Why is water salty at all, you might ask? That's because of the slow accumulation of different mineral salts that run into the seas or oceans from rivers, eroded off rocks over long geological times.
The Mediterranean U

ndercurrent flows out under the surface in pulses. It then cascades down over the continental shelf between the Iberian peninsula (Portugal, Spain, Gibraltar and Andorra) and settles out between 500 and 1500 m depth, moving westward guided by sea floor topography and it's own buoyancy. The Earth's rotation produces an effect known as the
Coriolis force, that coerces the current northward along the continental shelf of the Iberian peninsula as far north as Ireland and even Iceland, where it is all the time mixing with the Atlantic waters while cooling off and being diluted. We set out to image this current using seismic waves.
This technique is a rather new tool to oceanography, but it has proved to be incredibly adept at imaging layers within the ocean. For decades, seismic techniques have been used to image layers within the solid earth by observing how sound reflects differently from different layers (different rock types). Basically what they are, are boundaries of different physical properties (different densities and elastic properties) such that sound travels differently through them and reflects to the surface at different angles and with different intensities. By measuring these varying intensities, seismologists are able to "map" the subsurface by "listening" to how long sound takes to travel from the surface, to an interface and back.

As our ship steamed along at about 6 nauts, we fired off an air gun at the back, which produces a bubble of air as the source of the sound. Further behind the ship we towed a long cable filled with hydrophones, basically highly sensitive microphones, which record the reflected sound. On-board there is a marine biologist. He is continuously on the lookout for whales and other marine mammals that may venture near the ship. Indeed they do on a regular basis, and we often see dolphins surfing on the bow wave. The air gun produces a pretty significant sound that no doubt is heard by the dolphins and whales. It doesn't seem to bother them however, but we take precautions anyway. In fact, given the long distances that sound can travel through water (since it is a lower-loss medium than air), whales can communicate with one another over thousands of kilometres. With the increasing ship transport due to
globalization, the amount of noise in the ocean from ship engines has increased tremendously over the years such that some people believe it is affecting whale migration routes because they are not able to communicate as well over the background hum of diesel engines.
Anyway, we are out there to study the Mediterranean Undercurrent and to calibrate the new seismic oceanography method against conventional oceanographic techniques that explore the ocean using dropped probes which measure temperature, conductivity (thus, salinity) and pressure. While these provide a great measure of the vertical variability of ocean property contrasts, they are usually only dropped about every 1 km or so. So, the seismic method really helps out here because we can provide horizontal resolution on the order of about 10 m.
In the end, the image looks like this:

First of all, I should explain... number 1, these colours are artificial. The ocean, of course doesn't really look like this. Well, not visually, if you could see it at such dark depths. What you are looking at here is a vertical slice of the ocean, as seen by reflected seismic waves. The grey at the bottom is the sea floor, the yellow is what's known as the North Atlantic Deep Water, water of the North Atlantic in the
Bathypelagic and
Abyssal Zones. The red represents the Mediterranean Water and the green, above is the North Atlantic Central Water. The colours are totally arbitrary and have no meaning except to show the boundaries between the different water masses (these are seen as the darker patchy colours throughout, that define the ocean structure). While, these water masses have been known for some time by probing the ocean with instruments, we see that the seismic wave amplitude also changes from shallow to deep. This is due to the property contrasts between the different waters. Because the Mediterranean Water is warmer and saltier than the others, sound reflects to a higher or lower degree. The amplitude of the seismic wave is a measure of the amount of reflection (as opposed to transmission through the water). If you had an uniform water of the same density and temperature, none of the sound that we generate at the surface would reflect and we wouldn't see anything at all! But, because of the differences of the properties of the water masses, we can create an image of the physical structure of the water. Notice, how in the Mediterranean Water (red zone), there is a large lens type structure. This is what is know as a "Meddy", or an eddy (whirlpool) composed of Mediterranean Water, hence the name. They are formed as the Mediterranean Undercurrent turns north at Cape St. Vincent, the extreme southwest edge of Portugal. Here, part of the Mediterranean Water starts to spin and translate roughly westward. This structure is about 80 km wide and 1.5 km thick (so, this image is not to scale, it's actually much thinner, vertically). It spins slowly in a sort of solid body rotation.
We are developing this new method of
Seismic Oceanography to try to introduce seismics into the well-established field of physical oceanography. There are a number of hurdles to overcome, but we think it adds a new tool to physical oceanography that may tell us something about the large scale structure of the ocean and in comparison with historical data, maybe something about the temporal variability of ocean currents, which may influence opinion on climate change. You can find my paper on the Mediterranean Undercurrent,
here.
Peace,
Grant