My cousin Jess is a first year law student at the University of Alberta. She's working super hard, but she took a break last night and we hit the Black Dog pub for a couple rye and gingers! Smile, smile, smile.
Whyte Ave. is in the heart of what was once the town of Strathcona, before the creation of the city of Edmonton in 1912. The rail line rolls right through the center of the neighbourhood. This is fun if you like watching trains, not fun if you are waiting to get to the other side of the tracks! (This is not a hyperlink, but I can't seem to remove it!)
Damn!
Damn. Damn. Damn.
Oh! Look at my wonderful digital camera. It has a gazillion mega pixels that make the picture quality almost exactly the same as celluloid. Also, it has enough memory to store 3ooo photos. And this computer? It's got so much operational memory that you can download 400 different things while simultaneously running several programs. And, it's mobile capability is such that you can be 1000 km from a wireless source and it will still pick it up.
Well, that may be, but the fact remains that one false move of your fingers, one unintentional click of the mouse, or a brief flicker in the power and all the benefits of such technological toys are nullified. Take it from me. All my photos from the trip thus far are gone, 'cause I thought I was deleting old photos, but apparently I had selected incorrectly and deleted the new ones. My computer, likewise, has lost all sorts of "valuable" files because of a seemingly innocent error. And, yeah, fine, you could say "It's not the fault of these devices. They aren't malicious. They haven't been scheming to subvert your efforts. You made the mistakes and are now dealing with the consequences." Well, aren't you the Job's comforter. That's just great! ARRRRGH!!!
I guess this experience highlights a couple things for me. One, that I am very attached to many of the material (and I guess digital) things that I have, and that I shouldn't be. 'Cause shit happens and you lose stuff, even when you think it's safe.
Second, and of more relevance to the project, humans (not just me) often ignore the imperfections inherent in technology; it's only when things go wrong that we remember. We forget how much in our daily lives rely on technology, confidence in science, and trust in the ability of scientists, to the point that we actually believe that we are in control of the world around us. And then, just when everything is going fine, we wake up to the reality: we have control over precious little in this world.
Think about all the drugs that are put on the market without sufficient testing. One day, after thousands of people have been using them for years, new tests reveal nasty side-effects. Thalidomide is a good example. First, doctors and scientists said "Hey! This drug helps reduce the discomfort associated with morning sickness. Lap it up ladies!" Then not long after "Um, well it seems that if you take that drug in your first trimester, your child is going to be deformed. Sorry about that." People were shocked.
When penicillin was discovered in 1929, it was like a miracle. Further research lead to the discovery of other antibiotics and lead to a drastic reduction in our mortality, so naturally we used them as much as possible, and no one said boo. Then came the revelation that the overuse of antibiotics not only in humans, but also our livestock, was leading to the evolution of "super bugs" immune to the arsenal of modern medicine. Again, people were shocked.
We were shocked because we trusted the science behind these discoveries, as if it were infallible. In most cases the people behind the discoveries are not to blame. But, let's remember, scientists put their pants on like everyone else, and sometimes they even forget to do up their fly.
In his book, The Sacred Balance, David Suzuki talks about our trust in science. He says that "the aura of authority carried by scientists has made us believe that knowledge obtained by scientists is the ultimate authority."
And in her book Dark Age Ahead, Jane Jacobs talks about something called "credentialism" which I feel is closely tied to this authority we give science. Credentialism is an unquestioning respect for everything academic. The higher the level of academia that information comes from the more reverence we have for it. Very few of us question science because the things it investigates are often beyond our realm of understanding. But doing this isn't pleading ignorance, it's pleading laziness, and I'll be the first to admit my guilt.
This project is not about mobilizing a fight against technology or contemporary knowledge, it's about regaining a the balance between natural wisdom and scientific savy. The title of this entry was born of frustration and anger. I was so mad that I had no control over these temporal things that I valued and lost. But, obviously, I don't hate technology. Hell! It's the very thing that is allowing me to express myself. I can't hate it! What I do hate is realizing how easily I become complacent and comfortable in a world where such a state can only lead to trouble down the road.